David was born in 1748 and died in 1825. These were tumultuous times in French history coinciding with the rise of the French monarchy, it's fall during the French Revolution, followed by the rise and fall of Napoleon Bonapart. Add to that a few more uprisings and coup d'etats mixed in at regular intervals, and you have the makings of an "exciting" era in which to paint. David's career as an artist during this time could be likened to a surfer riding, and sometimes falling victim to, great waves, in this case, great waves of political and social turmoil.
Having won the prestigious Prix de Rome, (a year of study in Rome, free of charge), David was a product of the French Academie establishment. His classical Oath of the Horatii (1784-5) is an icon to officially sanctioned art. His Death of Marat in 1793 became a similiar icon for the French Revolution. And just a few years later in 1800, in his Napoleon Crossing the Alps, we see the ironic end to a fervent revoluntionary as the artist jumps on board the movement of yet another ruling elite. Is this the mark of political astuteness or merely a career tossed and turned in a sea of tortured change? Or both?